Sotomayor’s Temperament

by

I agree with TWI’s Daphne Eviatar, completely.

When I watched the oral argument in Arar v. Ashcroft earlier this year, I came away thinking, specifically, that Judge Sotomayor could make a good Supreme; not that she had temperament issues.  It was Judge Calabresi who went over the top, posing question after question without ever letting the government’s lawyer respond.  (Though, in his partial defense, I think he could tell from the way the lawyer’s attempted responses started that they weren’t going to address the real point of his question.)  Another judge, whose name I don’t remember but whose sympathies cut the other way, went similarly over the top when questioning Arar’s lawyer.

Sotomayor was doing exactly what an appelate judge should do: ask very pointed questions that get directly at the problems with a lawyer’s argument, and listen, critically, for a good answer.  I thought, of the entire 12-judge panel,  she struck the right balance.

Advertisements

Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: